Issue of the legality of one’s Rev

Issue of the legality of one’s Rev

1857.

3rd.-The fresh new next anniversary out of Judge “Crown and you may Point” A good.O.F. is known because of the a dinner during the Buddy. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled the fresh sofa, and it is reported that the newest Court upcoming contained 90 members.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and J. Bayly is decided to go with the newest members of people Collection Committee.

p. 207 The body off a great whale, that has been taken on Winterton, was being displayed towards the Chapel Plain.

This new Rev. W. D. Wade, brand new minister from St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before leaving Southsea, become presented with a bag out-of ?61.

twenty-first.-New “Sisters” got for the accident that have one of several stone piers away from the brand new Connection, which it had a lot more busted.

Feb. last.-An enthusiastic Anti-Income tax conference had been stored from the Urban area Hallway. The Mayor presided, in addition to pursuing the took part in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you can J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared as if the fresh new mover within amount.

Feb. twenty-first.-A good “Poor’s Speed” fulfilling was actually kept at Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may an answer protesting from the 1s. 6d. quarterly speed is actually then followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you may F. Starling spoke on the subject, just like the conduct of your own Guardians is defended because of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among Panel.

Feb. 25th.-An incident and this excited considerable appeal, was actually read in the Condition Legal, Tolhouse-hallway, up until the Courtroom (T. J. Birch, Esq.) New plaintiff is actually Mr. John Cobb, fabric vendor, to have who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin featured; the latest defendants was in fact Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can Grams. D. Palmer, who were depicted by the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The latest plaintiff reported that he had been an applicant on office from Councillor on the e for example at solicitation out of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can Grams. D. Palmer. At that time he turned into an applicant the guy extremely informed all of them that he wouldn’t shell out from his very own pocket a lot more than simply ?ten with the expenses of your own election, and it is know that the Liberal class, that he belonged, create signup the remainder. The night till the election he obtained an offer regarding what the costs was basically apt to be, plus in outcome of which he at a time spotted each other Mr. Burroughs and you will Mr. Grams. D. Palmer. That estimate, he thought, amounted to help you regarding the ?forty-five, since subscriptions entirely amounted so you can however, ?42. Once particular dialogue they offered to keep your harmless of your own number of the expense that might meet or exceed the sum of subscribed, and he and you can Mr. Burroughs then ran p. 208 with the Committee-room of the Northern-ward, where Mr. Burroughs said they had generated preparations because of their friend John Cobb successful the market-ward. The expense of election, he (the newest plaintiff) forgotten, amounted altogether to help you ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, hence, that he now claimed on the defendants try ?16 1s. 7d.-New plaintiff, inside cross-test by Mr. Cufaude, acknowledge that ?39 of the entire number try to own – -.-Mr. Cufaude argued whenever, given that plaintiff stated, the fresh new defendants had given him a hope for the excessive expenditures, the brand new guarantee ought to are in creating. And you will, and when the evidence is true, and that, although not, the guy disputed, it absolutely was hopeless with the plaintiff to recuperate, inasmuch as he themselves got enjoy one to a corner away from the full costs are getting – -, which was an unlawful work.-Mr. Chamberlin contended the plaintiff, immediately following searching the fresh pledge on defendants, acted simply up on the newest faith of these vow, which for this reason, as they got inserted through to a wedding to invest the cash, they were responsible. The cash, more over, had not been spent from the plaintiff, however, because of the committee getbride.org Inspiser nettstedet appointed in order to make the latest election, and you can before the election is more, this new plaintiff wasn’t aware some of the currency had started invested in the – -.-Their Honor told you it had been obvious the newest ensure have to have started on paper. He had been from advice, and, that plaintiff was not destined to spend the money for illegal costs, and consequently he might not provide his step for money that he stated.-Brand new plaintiff are, accordingly, non-recommended.